Stephen Colbert, known for his wit and passion as a Lord of the Rings fan, is now taking on the ambitious project of creating a new film in the beloved universe. Here are my thoughts on this unexpected development.
So recently, it was announced that Stephen Colbert is making a Lord of the Rings film called The Shadows of the Past. Now I like Stephen Colbert, but it is kind of weird seeing him write a Lord of the Rings film; he is a big fan like me and so many others. However, the plot of the film is basically a sequel to The Lord of the Rings set 14 years later, after Frodo, and according to Colbert, this film will explore chapters from the book that the movies didn't have time to explore, and Colbert has said that he wants this to be faithful to Tolkien's work and the movies. His son is writing the script with him, but his son wrote The Rise of Skywalker, so that is a red flag. Also, Sam's daughter, Elanor, will be in the film as she learns of how the War of the Ring was almost lost before it began. Now, this film could be good, but who knows? Some fans don't think we need this, and I get it. I would rather get adaptations of the first age storylines, but it all depends on who makes them, because I don't want them to be like Rings of Power.
Now, if Colbert adapts the storylines of Frodo and Sam's quest to Rivendell the way they adapt the Barrow-Wright storyline with Tom Bombadil, that could be a good short film. However, the chapter where they meet Farmer Maggot couldn’t happen in the films, as they had already encountered him in his crops. Even if they bring back the actors, they will de-age them because Billy Boyd is almost 60. Still, in this film, we shall see what they do, and I get why some people aren't thrilled with Colbert writing a script for The Lord of the Rings. I just hope what he said is true, that he wants to be respectful to Tolkien's work. We shall see if he does, but I just hope they don't milk the Lord of the Rings franchise, because we are getting Hunt for Gollum, and to be honest, I would have rather had the Battle of Dale adapted than this, because that could be a good storyline. I just hope Sam's daughter is not going to be all you know, like Cassie Lang. If you've seen Ant-Man 3, you know what I'm talking about.
If they are making this into a new trilogy, I would call it Unfinished Tales. The Hunt for Gollum is the first film, Shadows of the Past is the second, and the final film, if we were to choose, would be called The Battle of Dale. To be honest, it would be the Side-Quest trilogy, because you have three storylines set during The Lord of the Rings that films couldn't adapt on screen due to runtime, so we are getting film adaptations of these storylines as their own films. It does sound confusing, like, couldn't they just make that Barrow-Wright story into an animated film? Or they could just make these films into an animated film trilogy so you can bring back all the actors of the film to voice their characters, but I get it, they want to make it live action. I’m just saying, making these storylines into animated films could be much easier, and you can bring back all the actors, but again, I’m excited to see Ian McKellen return as Gandalf in Hunt for Gollum, even if he’s 86.
Reminder that Colbert’s son wrote Rise of Skywalker... oh god.
Just as long as we can agree we don't want a sequel to The Lord of the Rings, I know Colbert's film is technically a sequel, but in the books, they do tell us what happens to all the characters after Return of the King, but not a sequel, we were like, somehow Sauron had another ring would be a terrible idea. Or as GRRM put it "No one wants to see Sauron Strikes Back."
So yeah, let me know what you think of Stephen Colbert writing a Lord of the Rings film. Do you think it will be good or do you think it's a bad idea?







.webp)


.jpg)























































